Dari Klausul ‘Menguntungkan Korporasi’ ke Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v3i4.1651Keywords:
corporate criminal liability, sugar import corruption, corporate benefit clause, identification theory, vicarious liabilityAbstract
The corruption cases involving sugar importation in Indonesia reveal the role of corporations as beneficiaries of abuses of power that cause state financial losses. This condition highlights the necessity of re-examining the legal construction of corporate criminal liability, particularly the relevance of the “corporate benefit” clause as a basis for prosecution. The research applies a normative juridical approach supported by empirical analysis of relevant court decisions. Findings indicate that the clause serves as a preliminary indicator of corporate fault, linking individual actions to corporate interests. The application of identification, vicarious liability, and aggregation theories reinforces the legal foundation for holding corporations criminally liable when proven to have gained from acts of corruption. Ensuring consistent enforcement of these legal principles is essential to advancing justice and enhancing the effectiveness of anti-corruption efforts in Indonesia.
References
Ahmad Rofiq, & Pujiyono. (2022). Strict liability as a counterbalance to the principle of error in Indonesian criminal law. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(2), 319–332.
Al Faridzi, M., & Nachrawi, G. (2021). Corruption as an extraordinary crime. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 11(2), 45–56.
Ali, Z. (2014). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Allen, M. J. (1977). Textbook on Criminal Law (4th ed.). London: Blackstone Press Limited.
Allen, M. J. (2012). Criminal Law (12th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Andi Hamzah. (2019). Pemberantasan Korupsi melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. (2018). Kebijakan Legislatif dalam Penanggulangan Kejahatan dengan Pidana Penjara. Semarang: Pustaka Magister.
Brahmantiyo Rasyidi, G. Nachrawi, & Juwita, J. (2023). The principle of strict liability in prosecuting environmental criminal actions by corporations. Jurnal Humaniora, 1(2), 45–46.
Brown, J. (2022). The vicarious liability of sports governing bodies and competition organisers. Journal of Legal Studies, Cambridge University Press.
Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth), Australia.
Dharmasisya, W. P. (2021). Implementasi PERMA No. 13 Tahun 2016 dalam pemidanaan korporasi Tipikor. Dharmasisya – Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 1(3), 45–62.
Fikri, M. (2025). Ironi Emas Hijau: Ketidakadilan Sosial-Ekonomi Petani Tembakau di Tengah Kontribusi Besar terhadap Penerimaan Negara. Multiverse: Open Multidisciplinary Journal, 4(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.57251/multiverse.v4i2.1850
Fisse, B., & Braithwaite, J. (1993). Corporations, Crime and Accountability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hendrawan, D., Andersen, C., & Tiopan, D. (2023). Responsibility of majority shareholders in adopting limited liability company policies affecting minority shareholders in terms of business judgment rule and good faith principles. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 58(2), 5–12.
Hiariej, Eddy O. S. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Hutauruk, R. H. (2014). Penanggulangan Kejahatan Korporasi Melalui Pendekatan Restoratif: Suatu Terobosan Hukum (Cet. ke-2). Jakarta: Pena Grafika.
Ibrahim, J. (2007). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.
Indonesia. (1999/2001). Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi sebagaimana diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Iwan Kurniawan. (2023). Kriteria untuk menentukan bentuk-bentuk tindak pidana dan pertanggungjawaban pidana dari korporasi yang melakukan tindak pidana korupsi. Unes Law Review, 5(3), 1293–1310.
Kozlova, A., et al. (2023). Criminal compliance program as a tool for criminal liability exculpation of legal persons in the Czech Republic. Laws, Article 7, 1–12.
Kristian. (2017). Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi: Tinjauan Teoretis dan Perbandingan Hukum di Berbagai Negara. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana oleh Korporasi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Mahkamah Agung.
Marpaung, Leden. (2021). Asas–Teori–Praktik Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Muladi, & Priyatno, Dwidja. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Bandung: Alumni.
Nadzir, Ambran. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban hukum terhadap procurement atas keputusan tender larangan praktik monopoli dalam bidang logistik. Journal De Facto, 8(2), 1–12.
Pieth, M., & Ivory, R. (2011). Corporate Criminal Liability: Emergence, Convergence, and Risk. Berlin: Springer.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 34/Pid.Sus/TPK/2014/PN.Jkt.Pst.
Santoso, B. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam perkara korupsi PT Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring. Jurnal Hukum Universitas Ibnu Chaldun, 5(2), 1–12.
Siregar, F., dkk. (2023). “Problematika Perhitungan Uang Pengganti dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi.” Jurnal Locus Media, 12(1).
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (2017). Ajaran Pemidanaan: Tindak Pidana Korporasi dan Seluk-Beluknya. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
U.S. Department of Justice. (2020). Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations. Washington, D.C.: DOJ.
Vidi Hartono, & Didin. (2023). Tanggung jawab perseroan atas tindakan direksi yang melebihi kewenangannya (Analisa terhadap doktrin ultra vires). Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 1(3), 122–135.
Waluyadi, et al. (2023). Corporate responsibility as a person for economic crime in Indonesian criminal law. Russian Law Journal, XI(3), 1202–1218.
Yulianti, R. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(1), 88–103.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
