Efektivitas Sanksi Pidana dalam Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak: Analisis dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Perpajakan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59246/muqaddimah.v4i2.1914Keywords:
Criminal Tax Sanctions; Taxpayer Compliance; Tax Law Enforcement; Ultimum Remedium; Tax Economics.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of criminal sanctions in improving taxpayer compliance in Indonesia from a tax economics perspective, and to identify factors influencing this effectiveness. This research uses a normative juridical approach supported by limited empirical analysis through an examination of legislation, legal theory, and secondary data related to tax compliance and enforcement. The findings indicate that criminal sanctions function as a repressive and preventive instrument in the tax system; however, their effectiveness remains suboptimal. This condition is caused by the low probability of tax audits, the complexity of law enforcement, and the dominance of an administrative approach that places criminal sanctions as a last resort. Furthermore, taxpayer compliance is influenced not only by the threat of sanctions but also by moral considerations, the level of trust in the government, and the perception of the fairness of the tax system. Theoretically, the effectiveness of criminal sanctions is determined by the interaction between law enforcement strength, administrative capacity, and taxpayer trust. Therefore, a more comprehensive policy approach is needed through the integration of criminal and non-criminal instruments to sustainably improve taxpayer compliance.
References
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972a). “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis,.” Journal of Public Economic. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com
Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972b). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
Beccaria, C. (n.d.). On Crimes and Punishments. 93–95. Retrieved from https://oll.libertyfund.org/title/beccaria-on-crimes-and-punishments
Direktorat jenderal Pajak. (2023). Laporan Tahunan DJP. Retrieved from https://www.pajak.go.id/id/laporan-tahunan
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2022). Laporan Tahunan DJP 2022. Retrieved from https://www.pajak.go.id/id/laporan-tahunan
Erich Kirchler. (2007). The Economic Psychology of Tax Behaviour. Cambridge University Press, 44–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511628238
Fazri, M. S. (2023). Efektivitas Ancaman Pidana Dalam Penegakan Kepatuhan Pajak. RESTITUSI : Jurnal Riset Perpajakan, 2(1), 51–63.
Fitria Virginia, E., & Soponyono, E. (2021). Pembaharuan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perpajakan Oleh Fitria Virginia, Erja, Soponyono, Eko 2021. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, 3(3), 299–311.
James Alm. (2019). What Motivates Tax Compliance?,. 356–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12272
Kirchler, E. et al. . (2008). Slippery Slope Framework. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
Liyana. (2019). Pengaruh pemeriksaan dan sanksi terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak. Retrieved from https://jurnal.pknstan.ac.id/index.php/JPI/article/view/530
Michael G. Allingham & Agnar Sandmo. (1972). “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 323–324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
OECD. (2022a). Revenue Statistics. 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/8a691b03-en
OECD. (2022b). Tax Administration. 89–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/1e797131-en
Soerjono Soekanto. (2008). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, (Rajawali Press, ed.). Jakarta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 MUQADDIMAH: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Bisnis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





