Pertanggungjawaban Produsen atas Keracunan MBG yang Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v4i2.1846Keywords:
food poisoning; consumer protection; producer liability; Free Nutritional Meal Program; strict liabilityAbstract
The Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG) represents a state policy designed to fulfill children’s right to adequate nutrition, yet its large-scale implementation poses significant food safety risks, particularly the occurrence of food poisoning incidents. The reliance on catering service providers places students in the position of vulnerable consumers who may be exposed to unsafe food products. This article examines the legal responsibility of producers for food poisoning cases within the MBG framework under Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection, employing normative legal research through statutory and conceptual analysis. The findings indicate that catering producers may be held liable under the principle of strict liability as stipulated in Article 19 of the Consumer Protection Law, without requiring consumers to prove fault. Furthermore, civil liability based on unlawful acts under Articles 1365, 1366, and 1367 of the Civil Code provides a legal avenue for victims to seek compensation, either individually or through class action mechanisms. Despite these legal instruments, Presidential Regulation Number 83 of 2024 does not explicitly regulate liability mechanisms or sanctions for food providers, resulting in a regulatory gap that weakens consumer protection. Strengthening legal norms and supervisory mechanisms is therefore essential to ensure legal certainty and effective protection of children’s fundamental rights as beneficiaries of the Free Nutritious Meal Program.
References
Dewa Ayu Sekar Vikanswari, I Ketu Sudjana, Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku usaha dan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen yang Mengalami Keracunan Makanan, Garuda Kemendikbud, Hal 1-2.
Frendly Moray, (2018). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN DI LUAR PENGADILAN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 2009 DALAM RANGKA PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN, Lex Privatum, Vol. 6. No. 10.
Grace Henni Tampongangoy, (2015). ARBITRASE MERUPAKAN UPAYA HUKUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA DAGANG INTERNASIOANAL, Lex et Societatis, Vol. 3. No. 1.
Kadek Pegy Sontia Kusuma, KARAKTERISTIK GUGATAN CLASS ACTION SEBAGAI MEDIA PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPERDATAAN DI INDONESIA, Jurnal Kertha Desa, Vol. 9 No. 2.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Pasal 1367.
Kitab Undang-Unsang Hukum Perdata, Pasal 1366.
Maryani, H. Zia, M. Agusta, (2023). Pertanggung Jawaban Pelaku Usaha Katering Terhadap Konsumen yang Keracunan Berdasarkan Prespektif Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlidungan Konsumen DiIndonesia, Datin Law Jurnal, Vol. 4 N0. 1.
O. S. Riyanto, M. R. Elfrida Sinaga, (2025). Penegakan Hak Anak Atas Makanan dan Sehat: Studi Kasus Keracunan Dalam Program Makan Bergizi Gratis Ditinjau Dari Tanggungjawab Negara, Jurnal Humanity, Vol. 2 No. 1.
R. purnamasari, Solihan, V. Azzahr. (2019). Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Produsen Makanan di Indonesia, Jurnal Gagasan Hukum, Vol. 1, No. 2.
Sumber: Kunci Hukum https://share.google/SrKVV8IfBLPVJbC63 di kunjungi 5 Januari 2026.
Sumber: Logika Hukum, https://share.google/VIowYaef3PWKtrmbd di kunjungi 5 Januari 2026.
Wagiman, S. P. Jit Kaur, (2025). Peningkatan Peran “Konsiliasi” dalam Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana, Vol 2. No 3.
Website: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/isi-pasal-1365-kuh-perdata-tentang perbuatan-melawan-hukum-lt6576f13b60c6a/
Yessy Kusumadewi, Grace Sharon, (2022). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Yogyakarta: Lembaga Fatimah Azzahrah, Cet 1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



