Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Putusan No. 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.JKT.PST

Authors

  • Aretha Aurora Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1746

Keywords:

proportionality principle, corruption, sentencing, judicial decision, Covid-19 social assistance

Abstract

Corruption is classified as an extraordinary crime that causes extensive harm to state finances and public welfare, particularly when committed during national emergencies. This study analyzes the application of the principle of proportionality in sentencing corruption offenders through Decision Number 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.JKT.PST concerning the corruption of Covid-19 social assistance funds involving the former Minister of Social Affairs, Juliari Batubara. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, this article examines whether the imposed sentence reflects the seriousness of the offense, the scale of state losses, and the extraordinary circumstances of a national disaster. The analysis reveals that the court failed to optimally apply the principle of proportionality by not considering Article 2 paragraph (2) of the Anti-Corruption Law, which allows aggravated punishment in specific conditions. This study contributes to the development of proportionality-based sentencing discourse and emphasizes the need for stronger judicial reasoning to ensure substantive justice and deterrence in corruption cases with significant social impact.

References

A. Garner, Bryan, Black’s Law Dictionary Deluxe Ninth Edition (USA: Thomson West, 2009).

Ali, Mahrus, “Proporsionalitas dalam Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana”, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum Faculty of Law UII, Vol. 25 (Yogyakarta, 2018).

Amiruddin, Korupsi dalam Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa (Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing, 2010).

Endri, dkk, “Proporsionalitas Putusan Hakim Berdasarkan Ide Keseimbangan”, Jurnal Selat, Vol. 7:2 (Mei, 2020).

Garner, B. A. (2009). Black’s law dictionary (9th ed.). Thomson West.

Imer Flores, ‘Proportionality in constitutional and human right interpretation’, George Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper, 2013

Pope, J. (2000). Confronting corruption: The elements of a national integrity system. Transparency International.

Renggong, R. (2017). Hukum pidana khusus: Memahami delik-delik di luar KUHP. Kencana.

Rugian, I. A. (2021). Prinsip proporsionalitas dalam putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (Studi perbandingan di Indonesia dan Jerman). Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(2), 267–286.

Ruslan Renggong, Hukum Pidana Khusus Memahami Delik-Delik di Luar KUHP (Jakarta: Kencana, 2017)

Setiawan, Hendi, dkk “Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Peredaran Narkotika (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 669/Pid.Sus/2018/PN. BTM)” Iuris Studia Jurnal Kajian Hukum, Vol. 2:3 (Juni, 2021).

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Aurora, A. (2025). Penerapan Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Putusan No. 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/2021/PN.JKT.PST. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v4i1.1746

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.