AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP SERTIFIKAT HAK ATAS TANAH YANG TUMPANG TINDIH: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 32/G/2023/PTUN SBY

Tjoe kang long; Widyawati Boediningsih

Authors

Tjoe kang long Universitas Narotama
Widyawati Boediningsih Universitas Narotama

Keywords:

Legal Certainty, Certificate, Land

Abstract

Legal efforts to facilitate referrals to plots of land so that good land management can be carried out. After the land registration has been completed according to the stages carried out, a Principal Rights Certificate is issued. This is proof of ownership and is considered strong evidence of the physical and legal data contained therein as long as the physical and legal data is still maintained. The data is in accordance with information from relevant survey documents and land legal documents. A certificate as proof of land ownership after being registered at the Land Office of course brings legal certainty to the holder. However, in fact there are several cases where the certificates overlap, such as in the case that was decided in decision number 32/G/2023/PTUN SBY between Sri Wulandari and the Head of the Batu City Land Office and I Made Artawan. Legal certainty regarding land ownership is by registering the land owned by each person, because based on Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Basic Agrarian Law, by registering the land we own, this guarantees legal certainty for the land owner and is proven by the issuance of a land title certificate. This land ownership certificate has strong evidentiary value as long as the land procurement and registration is carried out according to established procedures and there are no clerical defects in the land registration. Article 32 (2) PP Regulation Number 24 of 1997.

References

Salim, A. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Milik Dengan Adanya Penerbitan Sertifikat Ganda. Jurnal USM Law Review, 2(2), 174-187.

Wardani, B. R. S., Rodliyah, R., & Munandar, A. (2023). Akibat Hukum Atas Terbitnya Sertifikat Tumpang Tindih (Overlapping) Dalam Program Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (Studi Kasus Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Lombok Barat). Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 4(1).

Anatami, D. (2017). Tanggung jawab siapa, bila terjadi sertifikat ganda atas sebidang tanah. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 12(1), 1-17.

Utomo, S. (2023). Problematika Tumpang Tindih Status Kepemilikan Tanah. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 53-61.

Randa, G. (2023). Identifikasi Potensi Tumpang Tindih Bidang Tanah Pada Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap. Jurnal Teknik, Komputer, Agroteknologi Dan Sains, 2(1), 9-17.

Mulyadi, S., & Satino, S. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Kepemilikan Tanah Bersertifikat Ganda. Jurnal Yuridis, 6(1), 147-173.

Alfian, A., Dinata, A. B., Putra, M. T. K. A., & Triyunita, U. (2024). Penyelesaian Konflik Sertifikat Hak Milik yang Tumpang Tindih melalui Mediasi. Perkara: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, 2(1), 21-39.

Pratiwi, P. F. P. (2021). Upaya Pemberantasan Mafia Tanah di Kota Palangka Raya. Jurnal Untidar, 5(2), 2.

Taqiyyah, M. A., & Winanti, A. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Sertifikat Atas Tanah Ganda Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997. Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial, 5(1), 77- 93.