PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA SERTIPIKAT GANDA PADA PTUN

Authors

  • Sandy Sulistiono Universitas Narotama
  • Widyawati Boediningsih Universitas Narotama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v2i3.875

Keywords:

Land Certificate, KTUN, TUN

Abstract

The diversity of Indonesia's resources from land and sea has been recognized by the world. With this diversity of resources, the country certainly needs a legal umbrella to provide protection so that the potential of these natural resources is maintained into the future. So in this case, the state is in the position of "ruler" which has the authority to regulate the use of existing earth, water and space, as stated in Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. One embodiment of this article is the issuance of the UUPA which provides opportunities Indonesian citizens to own a plot of land in their own name, proven by ownership of a certificate. However, during the journey, a discrepancy was discovered that 1 plot of land was owned by 2 certificates, which created a sense of legal uncertainty for the owner. Therefore, this research will examine whether the problem of double certificates can be resolved at the TUN judicial body. Because this research is legal research, the approach used is a conceptual approach related to the concept of KTUN and TUN procedural law which is supported by a statutory approach using currently applicable provisions such as referring to the Constitution and other derivative regulations, KTUN, 

References

Buku

Aminuddin Ilmar, Hukum Tata Pemerintahan, Kencana, Jakarta, 2014.

Andrian Sutedi, Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2006.

Boedi Harsono, Hukum Agraria Indonesia (Sejarah, Pembentukan, Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi Dan Pelaksanaannya), Jakarta, Djambatan, 2008.

Irawan Surojo, Kepastian Hukum Hak atas Tanah di Indonesia, Surakarta, Arseola, 2006.

Mahfud MD, Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2011.

Prajudi Atmosudirjo, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta, Ghalia Indonesia, 1981.

Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Revisi, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.

R Subekti, Hukum Pembuktian, Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1987.

Supatra Nata, Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta, Rajawali,1998.

Urip Santoso, Pendaftaran Dan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta, Prenada Media Group, 2010.

Wicipto Setiadi, HukumAcaraPengadilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada.

Zairin Harahap, Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2020.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 40 Tahun 1996

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997

Jurnal

Klaudius Ilkam Hulu, ‘Kekuatan Alat Bukti Sertipikat Hak Milik atas Tanah dalam Bukti Kepemilikan Hak’, Jurnal Panah Keadilan, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2021.

Karya Tulis

Chakim Lutfi M, “Contrarius Actus”, Kamus Hukum, Majalah Konstitusi No. 126, 2017.

Perpustakaan dan Layanan Informasi Biro Hukum dan Humas Badan Urusan Administrasi MA RI, Perkembangan Peradilan Tata USaha Negara dan Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dilihat dari Beberapa Sudut Pandang, 2011.

Tim Peneliti STPN, Penanganan Sengketa dan Konflik Pertanahan (Hasil Penelitian Strategis Stpn) 2013, Yogyakarta, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional, 2013.

Lain-Lain

https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2022/02/14/10-negara-dengan-keindahan-alam-terbaik-indonesia-juaranya, yang diakses pada 1 Mei 2024.

Glosarium Peraturan BPK https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Glosarium?p=70

Downloads

Published

2024-05-29

How to Cite

Sandy Sulistiono, & Widyawati Boediningsih. (2024). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA SERTIPIKAT GANDA PADA PTUN. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(3), 154–173. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v2i3.875