Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Dokter Dalam Melakukan Praktik Kedokteran Terkait Dengan Dugaan Pelanggaran Disiplin Yang Berdampak Terhadap Malpraktik

Authors

  • David Estrada Universitas Esa Unggul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v2i2.793

Keywords:

Disciplinary violations, Legal protection, Medical practice

Abstract

Malpractice can be interpreted as an act of negligence, error or a doctor's lack of ability to treat a patient so that it causes a bad outcome for the patient. Several malpractice cases that ended in decisions that did not blame the doctor and sanctions that were considered light were one of the things that made some people think that this law was not at all in favor of malpractice cases. Several doctors questioned how legal certainty would be for them if the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) had decided that no disciplinary violations had been committed but the district court said otherwise. So, according to the author, it is necessary to carry out an analysis regarding the severity of the sanctions imposed by the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council and what the legal protection is for doctors who are suspected of practicing medicine related to disciplinary violations. This research uses the juridical-normative method, namely research conducted by examining the laws and regulations that apply or are applied to a particular legal issue. Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council has the authority to handle violations of doctor's discipline. If there is a doctor's action that is classified as malpractice, Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council can only be guided by a doctor's disciplinary violation. Disciplinary sanctions for doctors by the MKDKI include giving a written warning, recommending revocation of the STR or SIP and the obligation to take part in education or training at a medical/dental educational institution. The Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council decision does not preclude the possibility for the doctor concerned to be examined, processed or sued criminally or civilly, because the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council decision has nothing to do with the application of law and criminal or civil legal sanctions and is basically a complaint, examination, up to the the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council decision or a public report. against doctors suspected of committing ethical violations is only limited to the ethics of the medical profession itself, which cannot be confused with the investigation process at the police, the prosecution process at the Prosecutor's Office until the court, or the lawsuit process at court.

References

Bahder Johan Nasution, Hukum Kesehatan Pertanggungjawaban Dokter, (Surabaya: Rineka Cipta, 2005),h.2.

Bambang Sutiyoso, Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis, Penerbit Citra Media,Yogyakarta, 2006,hlm3

Benard Arief Sidharta, Refleksi Tentang Struktur Ilmu Hukum, Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2009, hal.122

Eka Julianta Wahjoepramono, 2012, Konsekwensi Hukum Dalam Profesi Medik, Karya Putra Darwati, Bandung, hal. 301-302.

FdFrans Hendra Winarta. 2012. Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan Internasional. Jakarta. Penerbit : Sinar Grafika. Hal. 1 dan 2

Hanafiah jusuf M dan Amir Amri, 1991, Etika Kedokteran Hukum Kesehatan, Penerbit Buku Kedokteran EGC, Jakarta, hal.87

Hermien Hadiati Koeswadji, Hukum dan Masalah Medik, (Surabaya : Erlangga University Press, 1984), h.17.

Indonesia. Peraturan Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia tentang Disiplin Profesional Dokter dan Dokter Gigi. Perkonsil No. 4 Tahun 2011, BN No. 304 Tahun 2012 Pasal 2

Indonesia. Peraturan Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia tentang Disiplin Profesional Dokter dan Dokter Gigi. Perkonsil No. 4 Tahun 2011, BN No. 304 Tahun 2012 Pasal 3

Indonesia. Undang Undang tentang Praktik Kedokteran. UU No. 29 Tahun 2004, LN No. 116 Tahun 2004, TLN 4431 Pasal 55 (1)

J. Guwandi, Dugaan Malpraktek Medik dan Draft: “Perjanjian Terapetik antara Dokter dan Pasien”, (Jakarta, Balai Penerbit FKUI,2006),hlm 39

Laura Nader dan Harry Todd dalam Ihromi, “Beberapa Catatan Mengenai Metode Sengketa yang Digunakan Dalam Antropologi Hukum, dalam Antropologi Hukum ; Sebuah Bunga Rampai”, (Jakarta: Yayasan Obor, 1993), hal. 210-211.

M. Solly Lubis, Filsafat Ilmu dan Penelitian, Softmedia, Medan, 2012, hal 30

Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia. Keputusan Pleno MKDKI tentang Kode Etik MKDKI. No.533/U/MKDKI/ III/018 Tahun 2018

Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, 2001, Penerapan Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Kasus Korupsi, Bandung: Mandar Maju, hlm. 21

Michael Daniel Mangkey, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Dokter Dalam Memberikan Pelayanan Medis”

Nurnaningsih Amriani, Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2011, hlm. 19-20

Rachmadi Usman, Pilihan Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Penerbit Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2002, hlm. 1.

Rika Lestari. Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi di Pengadilan dan di Luar Pengadilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 3 No. 2. Hal. 219

Rinanto Suryadhimitra, Hukum Malapraktik Kedokteran, Ctk. Pertama, Total Media, Yogyakarta, 2011, Hlm 10

Satjipto Raharjo, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2000, hlm.53.

Setiono, Rule Of Law (supremasi hukum), Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 2004, Hlm.3.

Soerjono Soekamto,Ringkasan Metodologi Penelitian hukum Empiris,Ind Hill Co,Jakarta,1990,hal 67

Syahrul Machmud, Op Cit. hal 85, 219

Syahrul Machmud, Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Dokter Yang Diduga Melakukan Medikal Malpraktek, Ctk. Pertama, Karya Putra Darwati, Bandung, 2012, hlm 1

W. Friedman, Teori dan Filsafat Umum, Jakarta, Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996, hal 2 iii. Sesuai dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku

Yahya Harahap, Beberapa Tinjauan Mengenai Sistem Peradilan dan Penyelesaian Sengketa, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung,

Downloads

Published

2024-02-05

How to Cite

David Estrada. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Dokter Dalam Melakukan Praktik Kedokteran Terkait Dengan Dugaan Pelanggaran Disiplin Yang Berdampak Terhadap Malpraktik. ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.59246/aladalah.v2i2.793